Puzzle Strike 2: Birthday Bash deck

The second community bank deck in Puzzle Strike 2 is Birthday Bash (the first is Grand Melee).

ps2_splash_cards_base2.jpg

Presents

The main mechanic of this deck is opening birthday presents. It gets pretty crazy, but let’s start with the basics. Here are some cards that give “presents”:

 
gilded_present.jpg
spiky_present.jpg
 

As you can see from the help text at the bottom of the cards, getting a present means you draw a card and play it for free.

The first layer of taking advantage of this is simply having strong cards that you get to play for free.

decadent_cake.jpg

Decadent Cake as a present lets you crash twice for 0 actions (amazing!). Fireworks Accident lets you crash once, and gives you an action. Normally a crash costs 2 actions but in this case it’s costing -1 actions if you happen to open it. Do you like getting extra actions? Shakin’ Dance gives you a ridiculous 3 actions and 3 cards if for nothing if you happen to open it as a present.

Perhaps the ultimate is Happy Birthday though:

 
happy_birthday.jpg
 

Deep crashes (which let you crash any gem in your gem pile, rather than just the top one) are incredibly powerful, and getting two of them is nuts. If you manage to open that present and play it for free, that’s “happy birthday” indeed.

“Open Me” and “Open Anything” Cards

The next thing to consider is that there are cards that give extra bonuses if you open them as presents:

 
toy_shield.jpg
 

Opening presents is inherently strong (playing a card for free), and getting a free crash in addition to that—every time you open a present—would be back-breaking for you opponents. That’s the madness that Crashing Rhino brings to the table. This guy is brutal:

 
crashing_rhino.jpg
 

Choosing Your Own Present

The next layer of playing this deck is understanding that you can manipulate your own deck to ensure which cards end up as your presents.

 
wooden_shield.jpg
wrapping_paper.jpg
elegant_wrapping.jpg
 

Two of the above cards let you put a card from your hand on top of your deck (so that the next present you open will be that card), and the other two have the “top” icon. That lets you put a card from the bank on top of your deck, again letting you control which present you’ll open next.

Recursion

The last level of wrapping your mind around this deck involves something you might have been wondering about while reading all this. What happens if you open a present (play the top card of your deck for free) and that card itself lets you open more presents? Welcome to the recursive madness of Birthday Bash.

As an example, suppose you play The Big Gift, which gives you a crash gem and two presents. First, you do the crash (left to right order). Next, you open the first of the two presents by playing the top card for free. Suppose that top card is The Small Gift (shown at the top of this article). It gives you up to 3 swaps (swaps are optional so you can skip any of them if you want) so perform any of those you want, then you get two more presents. So you then open the first of the two presents in The Small Gift (which might contain even more sub-presents…but let’s say it doesn’t). Then you open the second of the two presents for The Small Gift (which also might contain sub-presents, but we’ll move on and say it doesn’t). Phew! You aren’t done yet though. Remember that all this is “inside” the first of two presents from The Big Gift. Now that you have finally finished fully resolving everything about the first present from The Big Gift, you then open the second present from The Big Gift. Here’s that order, visually:

The point is, presents inside presents (inside presents…), can get pretty bonkers.

Now that you’ve wrapped your mind around all that (or maybe you haven’t!), you can see the point of Last Gifts.

 
last_gifts.jpg
 

You get two presents for just 1 action, which is crazy, but you don’t get to do anything recursive with them. If either of your two presents from Last Gifts would themselves give more presents, instead they don’t.

There’s More Than Just Presents

This deck is quite a ride to play. While the birthday present mechanic is the main theme, there are some other spices in the mix as well.

 
party_time.jpg
 

This may not look like much, but remember that you have four super meters, each of which activate a super move when they get 4 gems in them. So you’re filling all four meters 25% every time you play that. That’s in addition to filling those meters the usual ways of crashing gems and holding the scepter. It can get pretty wild with super moves.

Speaking of The Scepter of Power, check out this unique card:

 
royal_privilege.jpg
 

A card that does nothing unless you’re bold enough to hold the scepter! And if you are, a free crash gem! That adds an interesting shift in incentives for holding the scepter as well as an interesting choice to buy this card just to deny other players from having it (there’s only one copy in the deck).

That’s the shape of Birthday Bash. It’s a combo explosion just waiting to happen and if does happen, you might experience quite a “happy birthday” moment.

Puzzle Strike 2: Grand Melee deck

Puzzle Strike 2’s base set includes 10 characters and two different community banks decks. Each bank deck changes the feel of the game. Those decks are Grand Melee and Birthday Bash:

ps2_splash_cards_base2.jpg

In this article, I’ll explain the thinking behind the Grand Melee deck. Think of Birthday Bash as a steak with a distinctive steak sauce, while Grand Melee doesn’t need the sauce; it allows the natural flavor of the meat to come through. In other words, it emphasizes all the fundamentals.

There are several fundamental things you do in Puzzle Strike 2, such as blocking, crashing, swapping, drawing cards, and spending actions. Let’s look at how Grand Melee effects all that.

Blocks

When you have incoming gems waiting to fall into your gem pile, you can negate them with blocks. Your starting deck has two basic block cards that cost 1 action and negate 3 gems. The Grand Melee deck lets you add more powerful cards to your deck such as these:

effortless_block.jpg
gem_shield.jpg
defensive_flourish.jpg

These blocks cost 0 actions which makes them a heck of a lot easier to fit into your turn. Effortless Block has even more benefit over the basic block than a 0-cost though. It also has the “top” icon which lets you put a card from the bank on top of your deck. If you have a way to draw a card, that lets you potentially play that card on the same turn, but the real thing it teaches you is about drop patterns. When you choose which card to buy from the bank, the pattern of colors you leave behind is the pattern that will fall into your next opponent’s gem pile. You can’t let them get three purples in a row or something. The “top” mechanic lets you manipulate that drop pattern which frees you to buy the card you want without it backfiring by leaving an easy drop pattern behind.

Gem Shield is able to get rid of four gems in total, rather than just three, but it only does that if you actually have incoming gems and gems in your gem pile. What you learn from this card is that the ability to delete gems already in your gem pile (not just the ones that will fall) is really useful and lets you dig for runs of one color that are buried under some garbage gems at the top.

Defensive Flourish is unique in Grand Melee in that it’s the only card in the deck that self-trashes. This is both good and bad for you. If you could have an incredible block that you could play over and over, that would be good. You can only play it once, then it’s gone, but that helps you in a different way: deck-thinning. It does way more than a block normally would (blocks SIX and also draws two cards!), then it disappears from your deck and makes you more likely to draw your cards that actually win. This is great if your plan is to win soon, but you need to survive just a little bit longer to do it.

Blocks that cost 1 action rather than 0 have to be a lot better. If you’re willing to pay 1, here’s what you can get:

 
deflect.jpg
barrier_block.jpg
 

Deflect lets you affect the drop pattern with the “top” mechanic and also comes with a swap to slightly fix up your gem pile. Meanwhile, Barrier Block has an even better swap: a deep swap. That lets you swap any two gems in your gem pile, not just any two that are adjacent. The -2 buy cost icon basically means you have a wider choice of cards to buy from that won’t result in you having to take incoming gems. This is a great fit for a defensive card because it’s keeping you alive by negating gems, and ensuring your buys will have better quality cards for a stronger deck later.

Crashes

Crashes are how you actually win. Your starting deck has two crash gems that cost 2 actions. Here’s what Grand Melee can offer you:

 
gut_punch.jpg
haymaker.jpg
 

These purple cards let you crash for just 1 action, which is a huge deal, but they each have drawbacks that wear you down over time. That’s purple’s thing in general.

 
kidney_shot.jpg
one_two_punch.jpg
 

These pink cards have no drawbacks though. Pink is the color of engine building and it has two really solid building blocks here. Kidney Shot costs the same 2 actions as a basic crash gem, but it can crash any gem in your gem pile, not just the top one. That’s super strong. And if you are willing to spend 3 actions, you can get two crashes with One-Two Punch.

Here’s some cards that let you crash for free in tricky ways:

 
sucker_punch.jpg
roundhouse.jpg
dash.jpg
 

Actions

You can always use more actions if you can get your hands on them. You have 3 actions per turn, then 4 and 5 actions once the first and second “ante up” cards are in effect. But cards can give you more.

Notice how pink is happy to give you extra actions with Footwork, while purple tempts you with more, but with drawbacks:

footwork.jpg
reckless_charge.jpg
overextend.jpg

Utility

Everyone needs to swap to line up the colors in their gem pile. Green often has utility cards that let you do generally useful things. See Taunt’s approach vs purple’s Monkey Step which tempts you with more, but with a drawback.

 
taunt.jpg
monkey_step.jpg
 

Also notice that Taunt straightforwardly gives you more swaps, while Adrenaline Rush gives you more cards.

 
adrenaline_rush.jpg
 

Rushdown

The concept of rushdown is that you need enough power right now to win, and it’s ok if there are drawbacks associated, especially if you have to suffer those penalties later. There won’t be a later because your plan is to win soon. Several purple cards above fall into that category. There is another concept of drawback that is a bit more invisible though, used by these cards:

 
sneak_attack.jpg
 

These effects are pretty strong at helping you win, but the drawback is actually what they don’t do. They don’t help you survive by lowering your gem pile. Crashes and blocks help you survive, and anything that can swap, draw, or give actions can indirectly help you survive too. But the above cards don’t at all. It’s a luxury to spare the space in your deck for them in the first place, and further luxury to spend 1 action in Sneak Attack’s case on something that doesn’t help you survive your turn. But if you can mange it, the effects are strong. Bloodlust means opponents can’t use blocks to negate the gems you send them, and Sneak Attack’s clause about the purple super meter means that opponents have to add three gems in a difficult pattern of colors to their gem piles.

Creatures

Most cards in the game are one-shot effects, but creatures stick around and give you benefits every turn. Here’s the creatures you’ll meet in Grand Melee:

golden_retriever.jpg
unleashed_tiger.jpg

Thieves’ Gambit

Finally, Thieves’ Gambit doesn’t fit into any of the categories above about enhancing the fundamentals. It’s a bit of spice added to the recipe.

 
 

It can enable potentially crazy plays, but there’s only one in the whole deck (that’s what the single star at the bottom of the card means). If it’s in the 4th or 5th slot in the bank, is it worth it to buy when you’ll have to take 2 or 3 incoming gems? Maybe. This card highlights the difficulty of that decision. Also, note that all players have access to the green super move which allows you play a card from the bank for free. So if Thieves’ Gambit is visible in the bank at all, someone might play it for free, which leads to them playing two more cards to free, which leads to who-knows-what. This thing is a miracle-maker.

There are more cards in Grand Melee, but that’s a good tour of what it has going on. Next time I’ll cover the Birthday Bash deck so you can compare its unique mechanic to the solid fundamentals here.

Help Us Fund a New Yomi Card Game

For the last few years, I’ve thought about my tabletop games Puzzle Strike and Yomi. I have not been thinking about new editions of those games, but rather entirely new games that are inspired by those games. I’ve done a whole lot of work on that, but I really need your help at this point.

The status right now is that my patrons on Patreon have access to all of the new Puzzle Strike-inspired game’s materials. They’re having a great time playtesting that (both print-and-play and online virtual tabletop versions) and you can too if you join. I’ve just started rolling out content for the Yomi-inspired game to my patrons as well. I will continue to do this for sure no matter what. If we are able to get a lot of interest—which means you joining to support us too—then we will also make a digital version of that Yomi-inspired game.

Here’s a preview of a little bit of the Puzzle Strike-inspired game:

ps_card_examples_whtie_web4.jpg

And here’s a preview of a little bit of the Yomi-inspired game

yomi_card_examples_whtie_web4.jpg

You can join my Patreon here to see more of these games as they develop.


Make an Awesome Digital Yomi-ish Game?

I have high hopes that if we do make a digital version of the Yomi-inspired game that we’re now equipped to create much better production values than we did on old Yomi’s digital version. We’re also able to do higher production values than in Fantasy Strike. As for the gameplay, I like it even more than Yomi. Also, both the online play and even single player experience can be better than in our previous digital card games.

But software development is very expensive and I’ve reached my limit. We need a bare minimum of $20k/month to sustain that development, and really more like $30k/month. That is doable and is being done right now by other designers. So please, if you would like to see this happen, let’s make it happen. As I said, I will continue to roll out the tabletop content to my patrons no matter what. Even better if you join and we can get this going.

More About These Games

Both of the new tabletop games I’m working on have a lot in common with each other, philosophically. They play nothing alike, but in both cases, they take the core thing about the games they’re inspired from, then take a different fork in the road. Both these new games mark the same shift in my tabletop design toward asynchronous play. That is, they let you get through your turn without having to go back and forth with the opponent(s) several times, yet still retain their strategic depth. This is very helpful for creating the possibility of play-by-forum, of asynchronous play in a digital version, of pass-and-play in a digital version, and even if only ever played as a physical tabletop game…it’s just a lot faster to get through the game without needing to break the action of your turn.

Both these new games have cleaner rules than my previous games. Fewer fiddly edge cases that rules that can be stated more simply and intuitively than before. I have always strived to do as good as I can on that issue, but it was really Pandante’s 2nd Edition that was the key for me. I’m usually checkmated by situations where a rule seems fine, but then playtesting shows it absolutely must have some small change to stand up to rigorous play. Then it needs a second fix and a third band-aid. No matter how hard we try to revise it to not need those fixes, it really does need them, and nothing can be done. In Pandante 2nd Edition, I finally took the more bold step of giving up on trying remove these band-aids (can’t…) or state them more cleanly (only slightly helps). Instead, by changing some fundamental working of the game, the entire realm of the problematic rule is avoided in the first place. No band-aid needed because the rule itself is gone and obsolete. (Btw, you can get that Pandante 2nd Edition here. It’s great!)

That’s also what I’ve done with these new games. The most annoying areas of rules aren’t “fixed” because these are not new editions of those games. Instead, these are different games that simply chose different rules-waters to play in—ones that happened to “just work”. No need to wonder if crashing zero gems gives you money or not in Puzzle Strike. No need to wonder how you play “no-card” at all in Yomi, what that even means, or how you handle the timing of it. That stuff is all gone.

Both these games are also more flavorful than their predecessors. The Puzzle Strike-ish game achieves that by coming alive with actually showing you the gems the game centers on manipulating. It all has a lot more “table presence”. The Yomi-ish game takes mild things that differentiated characters before and really amps them up. Projectile characters really feel like they’re zoning you compared to before. Special moves generally have whatever special properties they need, rather than my old insistence that they be rationed out in some certain way. And if a character needs some extra cards, or even an extra deck to work, so be it! Whatever is cool and flavorful is how it should be.

Conclusion

Please help me be able to afford the production values these games deserve, and have some fun seeing how they progress, too. Tell some friends to get on board so we can make an awesome digital version of the Yomi game. Also feel free to drop in our Discord chat and you can ask other people how they feel about the whole process.

Thanks for your consideration.

Joe Biden Is a Garbage Candidate Who Will Not Be President

Edit: It turns out that a once-in-hundred-years pandemic rocked the world so hard, and Trump fumbled it so badly, that that one factor lead to Biden winning by the narrowest of margins. If just 42,000 people in key states had voted the other way, Biden would have lost. But he didn’t. So the most garbage candidate on the democratic side is now the president of the United States.

—-

Original post:

Today, Bernie Sanders dropped out of the US democratic primary election for president of the United States. It’s a dark day. So dark that I feel compelled to give context for anyone who hasn’t been keeping up. The amount of corruption and the unevenness of the playfield is truly disgusting.

Joe Biden

But first, Joe Biden. To say Biden is a garbage candidate is putting it really lightly. He is the literal worst possible choice that the democrats had available, checking every box you’d want in order to lose an election. He has no chance against Trump and is the least electable, most risky choice, yet was sold to us on the strength of the exact opposite: that he is somehow the most electable and safest. There’s so much bad to say about him that I’m going to have to just give quick highlights. If you plan to vote for him, you should know these things.

Sexual Assault

Biden has credible allegations of sexual assault against him by Tara Reade, for starters. It’s possible you are not aware of that because, incredibly bizarrely, there has been almost total radio silence across the entire mainstream media about this. The total lack of coverage by established media contrasted with the explosion of talk about it on social media brings into sharp focus just how corrupt the coverage of this election has been. If you think for a single second that similar allegations against Sanders would not have been covered wall-to-wall on every cable news channel, you’re not being honest. It’s obvious and conspicuous the protection Biden is getting. We are not seeing from the media a good-faith effort to inform the public on issues facing the candidates. We’re seeing mainstream media with a specific agenda, and that agenda is helped buy burring this story right now.

If you have heard about the allegations and think they don’t count because Ms. Reade wrote a positive thing about Russia once, I’ll remind you that that does not make sexual assault ok. And if you think that she is a “Russian operative” because of that, I’ll remind you that actual Russian operatives would not write things about Russia that could expose them as being Russian operatives. The point is, her claims are credible, and while I don’t know if they are true, we should believe women in general and take their claims seriously. This isn’t an isolated incident with Biden either. It’s a pattern of being way too handsy for decades and several incidents that go way past the line, including a literal sexual assault.

The sexual assault situation alone, regardless of anything else, should be disqualifying for him.

Mental Decline

Next, Biden’s mental state is clearly in decline. It’s uncomfortable to talk about that because my intent is not to shame him over it or to be mean-spirited about it. It’s obvious though. He is a gaff machine. He kind of always fumbled words, so that alone isn’t the issue at hand. It’s that the severity has drastically increased. Saying the wrong name of the state he’s in during an important campaign speech, mixing up which was his wife and which was his daughter in another. Getting lost in his own points quite often. His handlers know this and have used a “hide the candidate” approach, correctly strategizing that simply allowing him to speak is the worst thing he can do.

A person with his kind of mental decline is not a good choice for President of the United States, to put it lightly. But even if it was somehow “ok,” it will definitely not be ok during the general election. Trump will easily decimate him on this, probably just letting Biden ramble and get lost in a point and jump in with “Joe do you need a break? I know you’re not all there.” Yes, I recognize that’s rich coming from Trump. The point is that Biden’s mental unfitness for this job is going to be a serious issue (and one that NO other democratic candidate had) come time for general election debates.

Biden’s mental state alone, regardless of any other issue, is disqualifying.

Medicare-for-All vs Paying-More-for-People-to-Die

Next, Biden outrageously does not support medicare-for-all (M4A). Outrageous, you ask? Yes. This issue would take multiple articles to fully disentangle, because the nonstop lies about this policy from almost all sides have been truly historic. I’ve never seen a policy so universally lied about, so it’s entirely possible you are simply unaware of what is even going on with it.

Under M4A, you have no premiums, no deductibles, no co-pays, and no point-of-care costs of any kind. The mainstream media has done its very best to hide this very basic fact from you. Ok so it would be “free.” Surely there are big catches. Like you wouldn’t get to choose your doctor, and it can’t really be free I mean what about ambulance rides, what about cancer treatment? You would be able to choose your doctor much more freely than now, in fact. Any doctor you currently visit, you could still visit, then in addition to that ALL other doctors become “in-network”. So you would have vastly more choice. Ambulance is covered, cancer treatment, dental, vision, practically everything. It is far superior coverage to anything you could possibly have right now.

Even if you believe you currently have “good medical coverage”, it’s not as good as that. Even if, somehow, “everything” were covered by your current insurance, you still have a for-profit insurance company who could simply deny your claim on a life-saving treatment you needed, at any time, if they felt like it “wasn’t worth it.” But not with M4A.

Also, tens of thousands of Americans die every year as a result of not having medical coverage. And TENS OF MILLIONS of Americans have no health insurance. This is horribly immoral, and we’re the only developed country in the world (if we can even be called that) that simply lets people die when they can’t pay. We also pay massively more for care than any of those countries. Something like twice as much per capita yet still are far behind the rest of the world.

So sure, M4A is objectively vastly superior in the coverage (covers everything, not subject to whims of a for-profit company to deny you treatment) and it’s free of any premiums, copays, deductibles, and point-of-care costs. And it involves reasonable drug prices rather than insane ones. But it must be paid for somehow, and we can’t afford it. Actually, it SAVES TWO TRILLION DOLLARS over 10 years. The leeches and vultures of our disgusting system have siphoned off so much money (from multi-levels of bureaucracy, from being able to massively raise prices, from lobbyist changing the laws to make it a disgusting amount of profiteering) that we’d actually save money by just giving everyone healthcare.

ANY candidate who opposed medicare-for-all is saying that tens of thousands of people dying every year from preventable things is fine with them, even though letting them die will cost trillions more, because they really really really want their donors to continue profiteering off those deaths. It’s disgusting and outrageous. I personally can’t imagine ever voting for any candidate ever again for the rest of my life who so openly advocates deaths as these “centrists” who oppose medicare-for-all.

Joe Biden opposes medicare-for-all. Why? He has ties in the form of major campaign advisors who were lobbyists for the healthcare insurance industry. Outrageous corruption and a callous disregard for human life. Joe Biden recently shockingly went so far as to say that if he were president and somehow, against all odds, the senate passed medicare-for-all, that he would VETO it. Similar to what a cartoon villain would do.

Also factor this in: despite a historic level of lies and propaganda from monied interests specifically designed to deceive you about medicare for all, the MAJORITY of the country is still in favor of it. Before the global pandemic of the corona virus—before that!—it was the #1 issue to democratic voters with something like 80-84% approval. And 55%-60% nationwide if I remember correctly. So it’s not a centrist stance to say we should pay trillions of dollars needlessly to have tens of thousands of people die in our current system. Actually, the centrist stance is M4A and Biden has a fringe stance that is deeply unpopular.

Joe Biden’s opposition to medicare-for-all is, by itself, absolutely disqualifying, disgusting, and morally monstrous.

Lying About Civil Rights Activism

Next, Joe Biden has shocking history of lying. Yes, I’m aware that Trump is likely a literal pathological liar. Let’s not use whataboutism here. Trump being bad is a separate issue and right now, we’re examining why Joe Biden is a garbage candidate.

Over 30 years ago, Biden lied repeatedly about his civil rights record. He lied about which specific black leaders he met with, which churches he went to in his activism efforts. He lied about going to Selma, and so on. Then in 1987, called out on these lies, he admitted that these things were not true. He admitted then that he had not actually done any activism at all, hadn’t gone to those places or met with those people at that point in his life, but that his time as a lifeguard in a predominantly black neighborhood had given him perspective on the movement. I’m sure it did. But that’s not a reason to lie about it.

You are probably thinking, so what if he lied 30 years ago? Fair enough, people change, but how about this? Starting last year he began repeating the same lies from back then, dozens of times at dozens of speaking engagements. The height of his latest lies were when he outrageously claimed to have been arrested in South Africa when he was trying to visit Nelson Mandela, an event that did not happen. He then compounded this lie by saying later on, Mandela visited congress and thanked Biden for trying to visit him in prison, in the previous lie. The size of these lies is staggering. The lack of coverage on it in mainstream media is very telling too. This is straight up stolen valor that diminishes the work actual activists have done.

The outrageous lies Biden has told incessantly about his civil rights record are, by themselves, disqualifying.

Miscellaneous Other Disqualifiers

Honestly I could go on a long time. I’ve given at least a few broad strokes. Sexual assault allegations, mental decline, fringe and immoral and impractical stance on healthcare—during a global pandemic, and insane lies about civil rights. How about a few more quick bullet points:

  • Biden was the single strongest driving force behind making 94% of the Bush era tax cuts for the rich become permanent.

  • Everything about Anita Hill.

  • Biden has blood on his hands from his Iraq war votes, then lied about his support of the war later.

  • Biden voted to let states overturn Roe v. Wade and said that decision (which allows abortions) “goes too far.”

These things make Biden unfit to lead, but more to the point right now, they make him amazingly weak as a candidate. He has an overwhelming number of disqualifying weaknesses, and he no actual policies that generate enthusiasm. He is not a inspiring on climate change. He is not inspiring on gun reform or worker’s rights. He is anti-inspiring on the #1 issue facing voters right now of healthcare. The thing that probably should be the #1 issue is that money in politics has deeply corrupted the system into one of legalized bribery. He is overtly for this corruption though, both using it and arguing in favor of it.

I don’t know how else to tell you this: he can’t win. None of this is news. He was always the least electable candidate and still is. Why, then, is he the nominee at all? To say “because that’s who the voters chose” is itself a deception. That’s not a fair characterization of what happened.

Why Did This Happen?

In my opinion, there are three main reasons this disastrously bad loser of a candidate appears to have won the nomination. I will tell you the reasons, and I think this makes a whole lot of difference in who is at fault here. When the loser loses, be careful who you blame. It’s really easy to blame the wrong people, which then would actually be doing work on behalf of the true guilty parties.

1) The Media.

The mainstream media (CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WaPO, etc) have always had an establishment bias and hated progressives. But the masks really came off this time around. Months and months of non-stop negative coverage of Sanders, in bad faith, with no real basis, was beyond anything it had done before. WaPo doing 16 separate hit pieces on Sanders in the span of 16 hours. MSNBC manufacturing “news” segments simply to smear him such as “body language experts” saying Sanders moved in a mean way during a speech once, Chris Matthews saying no one should vote for Sanders because the real metric should be who would help you on the side of the road if you had trouble and he says Biden definitely would but Sanders wouldn’t. There’s way too much to cover here. It was insanely biased wall-to-wall smears while claiming to be neutral and unbiased.

These smears were almost all on things unrelated to policy (with the exception of medicare-for-all, which was just lied about) because there is no good way to attack Sanders on policy. His policies are actually super basic, standard in the rest of the world, and incredibly popular with American voters when you poll them issue-by-issue. So the non-stop media attacks had to be on manufactured things like the false narrative of “Bernie Bros” (note: same narrative we now know Hillary Clinton’s campaign planted in numerous press outlets in 2016).

The establishment democrats, donors, and elites in media were acting to keep their “good thing” going. Sanders plan to end corruption in the DNC, end corporate donations to candidates (which are bribes), put and to the whole scam of high paid consultants who leech off the system, and worst of all, to tax the rich fairly…absolutely terrified these people. All these elites just happened, coincidentally, to act maximally against the candidate who would tax them while propping up any establishment candidate who could maintain the status quo. So much for “news” coverage.

I can’t emphasize enough how extreme this stuff was. Sanders historic wins in the early primaries were downplayed universally by the mainstream media. Biden’s wins were trumpeted to build as much momentum as possible by the mainstream media. This stuff had a huge effect on older voters, who really ended up controlling the outcome. About 70% of voters over 45 years old favored Biden in this last set of primary elections while about 70% of those under 45 favored Sanders (but the youth vote didn’t show up in nearly big enough numbers). It was social media vs the outrageous bias of establishment media, and this time, establishment media won, using over-the-top propaganda. Imagine if there had been even remotely fair coverage. Instead, a huge number of Americans were told over and over and over and over again by cable news that Biden was safe and electable (another way to avoid talking about his deeply unpopular policies) while Sanders is “radical” and bad in every possible way.

2) The DNC.

Members of the DNC were FAR more afraid of Sanders than Trump, and for good reason. If Trump wins, their jobs will remain similar, and so will their gravy train. Sanders, on the other hand, made it clear he will end their corruption. He would reshape the party on day 1 of being the nominee by banning corporate donations and it would also be necessary (really really necessary) to outright fire most of them and replace them with people who aren’t part of that corruption. Their very jobs depended on opposing Sanders and wow did it show.

The DNC has a charter with a pledge of impartiality, which is an absolute joke. We know—for a fact—that they massively violated their own charter in 2016. Leaked e-mails from Wikileaks show that Debbie Wasserman Schultz (head of the DNC at the time) intentionally gave Hillary Clinton the debate questions ahead of time, but not Sanders. They show that she intentionally scheduled the low number of debates and their times in order to favor Hillary Clinton as much as possible. I think it was something like 94% of the money that flowed through the DNC at the time actually went through Hillary Clinton’s campaign. Not to the campaign, but she acted as a clearinghouse for DNC money in general. That means that downballot candidates across the country, who need DNC money to support their campaigns, were actually beholden to Clinton in that situation. An insane situation and advantage. The super-delegate system is also insane, and exists only as a thumb-on-scales cheat the subvert the will of the voters, and DNC used it maximally to undermine Sanders and favor Clinton.

Oh and by the way, in 2016, Debbie Wasserman Schultz transitioned from head of the DNC directly to being on Hillary Clinton’s campaign, just to rub it in our faces how much of a farce the “impartiality” clause of the DNC’s charter really was. They have no interest in picking the candidate the people want.

Back to super delegates, the DNC has less insane super delegate rules now, so it now puts the thumb-on-scales less than before with that particular mechanism (why do it at all??). But more to the point, you don’t have to wonder if the DNC massively favored Biden and stacked the deck absurdly much to prop him up. They did it overtly this time. They openly discussed how the hell they can band together and stop Sanders once he was doing well. There was a massive coordinated effort on the part of the DNC, going against their own charter, to torpedo a candidate that the people wanted because it would be bad for their donor class and for their own jobs.

THIS move is the main reason for the democrats losing in 2016. Do not go blaming someone who stayed home when given a choice between Clinton (a deeply flawed candidate and one of the most unpopular in history) and Trump (uh, same). Instead, the blame should go on the corruption of the DNC with an assist from the mainstream media that CREATED that situation.

We’re now in the exact same situation with the exact same bad actors (mainstream media and DNC) causing it again. In an actual fair contest, Sanders would be the nominee. Instead, they made it as unfair as they possibly could to prop up a candidate who will lose, who has numerous disqualifying flaws, and who no one is excited about. The idea that voters will turn out for Biden is laughable. And when they don’t, don’t blame them. Eye on the ball: the DNC is at fault. Mainstream media is at fault.

3) Election fraud.

Regarding voting machines, it's difficult to reach any conclusion other than enormous election fraud via voter machines flipping votes when you look at this data. The point being if you try hard to explain this on-the-level, I literally don't know how you can.

What it’s saying is that in every county where there’s no accountability in votes, no way to verify the votes are legit with a paper trail, Biden won by a lot more than exit polls would predict. In every county where there is a real trail to verify votes, Biden didn’t come out way ahead of expectations, and Sanders did a bit better than expected. Further, that the magnitude and frequency of this is so huge as to make basically impossible to be chance. SOMETHING is going on. And further, that if you try to come up with non-corrupt explanations to tie it to some underlying correlation, the only things people can come up with would have run the other way, not the way that favors Biden massively.

While I can’t definitely say there’s election fraud, it sure looks bad. And the “joke” here is that who do you even accuse? In other words, “who benefits?” Biden’s camp does, of course. But that doesn’t mean they did it. The republicans would benefit hugely, putting up the literal weakest possible candidate in the general election against their man. Putin would also benefit. Russian hackers trying to sew discord could hardly do better than making the weakest candidate win the democratic primary so that Trump can keep doing constant crazy things. Sadly, the DNC is the most likely entity to have flipped the votes on those particular voting machines. But I don’t know.

The End Game

There was definitely a massive effort to subvert the fair election process here by the DNC and the media. Possibly election fraud. But put yourselves in the shoes of the DNC and think of the end game. Clearly their most important goal, above all else, was get rid of Sanders (NOT to beat Trump, that’s a distant second for them). But once they accomplish that...surely they know Biden will just lose?

One possibility is they are incredible incompetent idiots and that’s the end. Yeah, he’ll lose, the end.

Another possibility is the plan all along was put in a vice president running mate who somehow massively changes the game enough that a win is possible. Maybe.

A third possibility, and the one that seems most likely to me, is that from day 1 of this sham, it was always clear to them Biden was unable to win the general election. The “electability” thing was a disingenuous scam. The real end game is to crush Sanders, then at the actual convention, say that, surprise, Biden’s health is declining so we’ll need to pick someone else. Then they will pick someone else, ANY non-Sanders person they can find, and whoever it is has a better chance of beating Trump than the Biden. Is that person Cuomo? Is it Michelle Obama? Is it Bloomberg? Is it the ultimate insane bad play of Hillary Clinton? I don’t know. But I have to think these people are not so stupid as actually plan to run Biden.

Conclusion

Biden is going to get really low turnout, and that’s the fault of the terrible entities that put us in this situation. It’s THEIR fault. Fixing this in the far future will come from taking THEIR power away. Fixing this is not telling some random female voter who couldn’t stomach voting for yet another sexual assaulter that it’s HER fault. Fixing it is not telling some dude who says if your’e not for medicare-for-all in a pandemic, then he can’t vote for your basically murderous healthcare stance. Fixing this is not about shaming voters. This is an extreme situation where media and the DNC bent over backwards to do what effectively screws us all. Hold THEM accountable.

Let’s try to build up alternative media who is outside of the incredible bias shown by the mainstream media. Support The Young Turks. They are completely clear what their personal opinions are, unlike every cable news host who claims to be neutral (then goes all in on propaganda). They provide very good and informative news coverage. They call out good and bad moves on a case by case basis, regardless of “which side” did the moves. They constantly show clips of insanely biased coverage from Fox news AND from so-called left-leaning mainsteam news. They are not “the Fox news of the left.” They are the opposite. They are good good faith actors in world of bad faith coverage.

They are also the biggest such alternative organization so they are our best hope at pushing back on this problem with the media. We should want them to grow and the power of cable news to wane. Growing any other such news organization (similar to TYT) that’s a real challenger would also be great. Right now though, TYT is the is the main actually challenger in play, and they’re doing good.

Here’s a link to be a TYT member. Yeah that’s an affiliate link, but it’s not about that. Sign up without that link if you even barely doubt my motives or sincerity. Or watch their coverage for free, they offer a lot of it, just a lot more for members.

Regarding reducing the power of the DNC, your best bet is to support the candidacy of any Justice Democrats you can. They are a group who pledges not to take corporate PAC money so they can actually represent the people instead of donors. Several of them are already in congress right now (AOC and The Squad for example). If they had greater numbers, they could steer the ship away from corruption.

And no matter how popular any given policy is (for example, federal background checks on guns poll at like 90-94% approval yet can’t even get a vote in the senate), nothing will happen until the money-in-politics problem is solved. It deeply corrupts everything to the point that government serves lobbyists and donors (in that case, the NRA) rather than the people. If you want to do something about that beyond supporting Justice Democrats, look into Wolf PAC.

Should you vote for Biden? I sure wouldn’t hold it against you if you didn’t. The fatal shot has already been fired, and I care more about holding the actual guilty to account.

Crowdfunding Sirlin Games

I’m crowdfunding several projects all at once right now and asking for your help.

Join Now

Here are things I’d like to do:

  • Add more characters and features to Fantasy Strike

  • Create new tabletop games, and possibly more content for Codex

  • Create digital versions of those tabletop games with good production values.

I’ve already started on these things, but finishing them is another matter. It costs tens of thousands of dollars per month to pay the various people we need to do art and programming for these kinds of things.

If you join my patreon (at silver or above, aka $10+), you’ll get access to what’s in-development right now. As of the time of this post, that means you’ll get to play development versions of characters in Fantasy Strike, and access to a new tabletop game that you can print-and-play and try for yourself. About twice per month, I’m going to share new content / characters / games etc. Usually substantial and playable each time. You can try it out as we go, shape its development, and make it possible to even finish this stuff. If you enjoyed Puzzle Strike, Yomi, and Fantasy Strike, then I really think you’ll be excited about seeing these new developments take shape.

The situation is that I have a TON of stuff in the works that’s playable and fun, but without your help, I can’t actually afford all the art and programming necessary to bring it to life. That goes for physical tabletop games, digital versions, and content in Fantasy Strike. Also, zero of the money raised is going into my pocket: ALL of it goes to paying artists and programmers.

There’s already a lot available to patrons right now, and a ton more is coming. Please help me be able to afford the production values these games deserve, and have some fun seeing how it progresses, too. Also feel free to drop in our Discord chat and you can ask other people how they feel about the whole process.

Thanks for your consideration.

Game Balance and Fantasy Strike

Fantasy Strike is an interesting case study in game balance for an asymmetric game. I did the entire balancing process without any data at all, and now, after it’s all done, we have the data. Meaning, we were collecting data, I just didn’t have a way to actually look at it until now, after the whole balancing process is basically complete.

Relying on Experts

I find it much easier to balance a competitive game by going off the opinions of experts than looking at data anyway. Experts can get to the bottom of issues more quickly, and with a much smaller sample size than a data-driven approach needs in order to be good enough quality to rise above statistical noise.

In some games I’ve worked on, I’m one of the experts (Fantasy Strike, Street Fighter HD Remix, Puzzle Fighter HD Remix). In other games, I’m not at all (Yomi, Puzzle Strike, Kongai) so I rely on players who have expert knowledge about balance. I’ve found both ways can work just fine, it’s all a matter of knowing which experts to listen to. On any given issue, you can always find someone who says X and someone who says the opposite, so it’s pretty critical to be able to evaluate which arguments actually make sense, and factor in whose opinions on such complex things have turned out to be right a lot before.

Looking at the Data

Anyway, now that we have the data, how did it all turn out?

First, a reminder about what success even looks like. Like in any such game, it’s a struggle to keep every character within a reasonable power range versus every other. It’s normal to have 8-2 and 7-3 matchups (meaning, if two experts played 10 games in a specific character matchup, we expect character X to win 8 and character Y to win 2, etc). The question is how many of those matchups there are. I tried to give some perspective about what percentage of 7-3 and 8-2 or worse matchups we expect to find in these sorts of games in this post about Game Balance and Yomi.

In Yomi, the matchup chart at the time showed literally zero matchups of 7-3 or worse, which was incredible, and I was unable to even name another game with 10+ sides that has done that. It’s unreasonable to expect that of ANY asymmetric competitive game, and would be an impossible standard to hold any fighting game to.

But…we did it. Here’s the empirical matchup chart based on hundreds of thousands of games played over the last year:

fs_matchup_chart_all_players.png

I’ve highlighted the matchups of 7-3 or worse in red. Just kidding, there aren’t any.

You might think that an empirical matchup chart like that can hide balance problems because it’s including a bunch of low-skill players, and maybe when the top players play there’s really unfair stuff that no one can deal with. That’s a good point. It’s worth noting that an empirical matchup chart that includes ALL players is still worth looking at because that’s, you know, the experience of the playerbase overall. So it’s a relief to find out just how tightly balanced that chart is. But yes, a chart that’s just experts might look wildly different, so let’s look at just the “master league” players (as well as the top 20% of elo players in casual matches).

fs_matchup_cart_master_league.png

There still aren’t any 7-3 or worse matchups. It’s pretty similar to the other chart and a shockingly narrow range of balance to anyone who is familiar with these types of charts in other games.

If anything, I actually think some of these matchups are truly closer than the data shows. Two of the most lopsided matchups in the game according to that chart (reminder: none actually show as lopsided there since nothing is even 7-3) are Jaina vs Geiger and Lum vs Valerie.

Geiger is probably the #1 most losingest character against me personally, so I was curious what my own stats are. When filtering the above table of expert player results for just games that I personally played, I found that my Jaina vs expert Geigers is 6.7 - 3.3 in Jaina’s favor (compared to 3.4 - 6.6 the other way around). Admittedly a small sample size there, but I feel like it’s a case where more Jaina players just need to step it up.

I have more to say about Lum though. He is probably the most difficult character to play well. The largest number of different situations happen when Lum is on the playfield because his random sets of items create all sorts of opportunities to take advantage of things if you know how, improv, and act fast. It’s no surprise that even amongst the top 20% of players, they still don’t really play him well enough.

The chart above lists Lum vs Valerie as 3.7 - 6.3, yet if we only consider the matches I personally played as Lum against those same top players, the number becomes 6.75 - 3.25 in Lum’s favor. And unlike the previous example, it’s not a small sample size. I guess that would actually make it the most lopsided matchup in the entire game in the opposite direction that the chart shows, so it’s hard to know the real truth. It’s also interesting that players routinely call out that matchup as very very bad for Lum, yet I have often accepted challenges in it, win them, yet I haven’t changed anyone’s mind apparently.

The bottom line is that the above data shows 89% of matchups are in the 6-4 to 4-6 range, with ALL the remaining matchups just barely worse, and 0% in the 7-3 or worse range. And some of the ones that are barely worse seem likely to be within that 6-4 to 4-6 range too, ultimately. (Based on my play at least! Or wait, they’d still be least close matchups, just in the opposite direction? Well, who knows.)

Popularity

In Yomi, we found an amusing inverse correlation with character popularity and character win rate. Midori was the least popular, yet most winning character while Setsuki was the most popular, yet least winning character. And in Fantasy Strike…the same thing happened again, almost.

Here’s the Fantasy Strike results from highest win rate to lowest:

  1. Midori   59%
  2. Rook     54%
  3. Lum      53%
  4. Valerie  51%
  5. Argagarg 50%
  6. Grave    49%
  7. DeGrey   49%
  8. Geiger   47%
  9. Setsuki  46%
  10. Jaina    45%

Now here’s the chart by character popularity:

  1. DeGrey     
  2. Setsuki      
  3. Valerie
  4. Grave 
  5. Jaina    
  6. Rook   
  7. Geiger   
  8. Lum  
  9. Argagarg    
  10. Midori    

In the Fantasy Strike story world, Midori is a martial arts teacher, while Setsuki is a ninja student. It seems that in the games, masters play the master while students play the student.

If you’re interested in playing Fantasy Strike, it’s available on Switch, PlayStation 4, and Steam.
Join the Discord chat to find out about weekly tournaments or to ask for matches and strategy advice.